Funded directly by HOUR, Summer PURA operates as the summer cycle for the ongoing PURA program. This program was created to provide Hopkins undergraduate students the opportunity to start or continue with independent research, scholarly and creative projects over the summer.
Award type: individual award
Award amount: $4000 per award recipient
Opens for applications: December 1
Deadline to apply: February 1 (11:59 pm)
Award announced: on or about March 15
Length of award: 10 weeks over the summer (exact work dates determined by student and mentor)
Questions? Please review the FAQs below and contact HOUR at HOUR@jhu.edu with other questions.
Who is eligible to apply?
All registered Hopkins undergraduates (freshmen, sophomores, juniors and seniors in the Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, the Peabody Institute, and the Whiting School of Engineering and in good academic standing (not on academic probation or suspension) are eligible. This program is not open to post-bac students (those students that just graduated)
What kind of projects are accepted?
Research, scholarly, or artistic activities that lead to the production of new knowledge; to increased problem solving capabilities, including design and analysis; to original, critical or historical theory and interpretation; or to the production of art or artistic performance.
What is an ‘independent” research, scholarly, or creative project?
Does my project have to be related to my major or minor?
Your undergraduate years are the time to explore your interests. We are happy to fund passion projects in addition to projects related to your major or minor.
Who can serve as my mentor?
Your mentor can be a faculty member, research associate, staff member, postdoc, or a graduate student from any division of the university as well as the Kennedy Krieger Institute (KKI), the Lieber Institute, and the Carnegie Institute. If your mentor is affiliated with the university through another institution (like NIH), please contact HOUR to get permission. If you have a graduate student or postdoc mentor, we do request that a secondary letter be submitted from the professor/ PI acknowledging that they are aware of the project and support it.
What is required to apply?
Can I apply to and or receive HOUR opportunities more than once?
Yes, you are encouraged to continue to apply to our programs throughout your undergraduate career at Hopkins. Projects evolve, interests change and HOUR wants to encourage your exploration. In the case of “tied” review scores in an individual program cycle, preference will be given to students that have not previously received funding through HOUR programs.
Note: If you apply to Summer PURA, BDP Summer Program and CIRCUIT for the current summer, you may only participate in one. All require your full time commitment and cannot be done concurrently.
Is there a formal product due at the end of the project?
Yes, all recipients are expected to present their project at DREAMS or one of HOUR’s student seminars held throughout the academic year. This presentation must occur in either the same academic year the award is received or the following year. Exceptions will be made on a case-by-case basis after the recipient contacts the HOUR office about a conflict.
There is also an opportunity for all summer program participants to present at the Hopkins CARES Symposium and Poster Session held in late July on the East Baltimore campus.
Who can serve as a mentor?
What is required of a mentor?
The mentor is expected to provide support and guidance for the undergraduate, meeting with them at a schedule that you both agree upon. These checkpoints are intended to make sure problems or successes are addressed and next steps planned out. The mentor should also guide the student in the creation of their presentation, whether it take poster format or some other medium. The goal is for the student to have a positive and successful experience.
We allow grad students and postdocs to be identified as the mentor because in many research groups and labs, they are the person working most closely with the undergraduate researcher. They then know the student best and have the most influence on habits, knowledge, and skill acquisition.
What should the letter of support include?
Your mentor letter should include the strengths and skills the undergraduate has that will enable them to successfully complete the proposed project. You should also touch on the amount of independence the student will have (a unique project conceived of by the student or a part of a larger project that they will be leading). You should also include your intent as a mentor touching on what support you will be providing. There is no page limit for this document, but it must be in PDF format.
How is funding distributed?
Students are paid $800 as semi-monthly salary (twice each month) from 5/16 through 7/31 (the first check paying on 5/31 and the final check on 8/15. Direct deposit is strongly encouraged.
What can the funding be used for?
Program funding may be used toward living expenses over the summer including rent and food. It can also be used for a new laptop, conference fees, travel, and other discretionary expenses.
Note: the Homewood campus offers limited dorm rooms and a rental sublet list. Contact the housing office for details. Upon request, HOUR is happy to provide a letter assuring the office you are working at the university over the summer.
How do we select reviewers?
HOUR staff reviews each submission looking at: the proposal title, the proposal summary (first paragraph/s), mentor, mentor department, students declared major to gain basic understanding of the project. We then research university faculty and post-docs to find subject matter experts or field specific reviewers to serve as reviewers. This is a very time consuming process but allows us to make strong reviewer/ submission matches.
What is required of reviewers?
HOUR staff works diligently to not overtax our reviewers, limiting to a maximum of 8 submissions per reviewer. Reviewers utilize the portal (SMApply) that applicants use. We request constructive feedback from our reviewers so we can help develop stronger researchers and proposal writers. Reviewers are asked to provide comments on 1. How well the proposal is written and 2. How viable the project is, to help improve skills on both.